Next Page  91 / 222 Previous Page
Information
Show Menu
Next Page 91 / 222 Previous Page
Page Background

مجلة النفط والتعاون العربي

161

العدد

- 2017

أربعون

المجلد الثالث و ال

2016

أوابك العلمية لعام

ص لبحوث العلمية الفائزة بجائزة

عدد خا

84

74

Table (16)

Capital Cost for Various Projects Adjusted to 2015

Capacity

Kton/y

Year

Capital

$ million

capital

Adjusted to

2015

K$/ton/y

USA

250

1991

120.0

217.0

0.9

USA

17

1994

7.0

11.8

0.7

USA

8

1994

3.5

5.9

0.7

USA

36

1994

15.0

25.2

0.7

Saudi Arabia

50

1995

28.8

47.1

0.9

Saudi Arabia

50

1995

17.7

29.0

0.6

UK

35

2001

13.8

19.6

0.6

UK

35

2001

25.2

35.6

1.0

Bahrain

36

2011

9.0

10.2

0.3

Turkey

80

2012

53.0

57.1

0.7

France

120

2013

72.5

76.2

0.6

Uzbekstan

45

2014

15.0

15.4

0.3

Australia

88

2014

65.0

66.6

0.8

Belarus

15

2015

20.0

20.0

1.3

Source: various

-

A collection of capital cost data over the years and different countries

does not reveal a definitive trend because the processes are not always

known and the circumstances of the projects may be different.

However, Table (16) shows the data with the capital cost adjusted to

2015 by using an inflation factor of 2.5% a year.

Italy: Example of Success

The experience of Italy in re-refining used oils is very relevant as an example of

a successful effort and cooperation between the government and the lube

manufacturing and re-refining companies.

The operation is helped by laws and regulations that evolved over the years in the

European Union or in Italy itself driven by environmental concerns and resource

conservation

104

.

The latest development in the legislative frame work is the follow up on the EU

Waste Framework Directive where re-refining used oil is at a higher priority than

burning for energy recovery though not compulsory. The Directive seeks the

reduction of waste production, preparing for re-use, re-refining or energy

recovery or disposal

104

.